Branches
Releases
|
Version
|
Focus
|
Date
|
|
4.50
|
Major feature enhancements |
13-Dec-2007 12:46 |
|
4.20
|
Major feature enhancements |
08-Dec-2006 12:08 |
|
4.11
|
Minor feature enhancements |
28-Jun-2006 21:01 |
|
4.10
|
Major feature enhancements |
13-Jun-2006 11:02 |
|
4.03
|
Minor bugfixes |
24-Apr-2006 01:05 |
|
4.01
|
Minor bugfixes |
10-Feb-2006 21:08 |
|
4.00
|
Major feature enhancements |
31-Jan-2006 18:49 |
|
3.9999
|
Minor feature enhancements |
28-Jan-2006 23:37 |
|
3.99
|
Major feature enhancements |
25-Jan-2006 12:51 |
|
3.95
|
Major feature enhancements |
08-Dec-2005 10:33 |
Comments
[»]
multi-threaded scanning suggestion
by Scott Edwards - Jul 7th 2004 05:37:40
At one time there was a nice little utility that scanned with two
threads. (and was very fast!) one thread would transmit, and
the other would log open ports as soon as they were
received. It used a touch of crypto to ensure it wasn't
receiving spoofs. scanning from two machines (or more)
would be a neat trick as well, as all the traffic initiators could
scan in behalf of the listener, and the listiner would log any
ports that were open matching the crypto signature.
Due to port speed scanning limitations and throttoling
requirments, you can scan one port on multiple hosts until
you've exausted all hosts, then scan for another port. This
lessens the need for throttoling.
I'd say mention my name somewhere, but I'm sure nmap has
a zillion contruibitors by now.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: multi-threaded scanning suggestion
by Scott Edwards - Aug 7th 2006 15:25:22
Did I mention I found hummingbird? It does what I'm after. Take a look at
it.
Thanks again :)
[reply]
[top]
[»]
The coolest tool for Linux!
by Gabriele - Jun 20th 2003 04:54:17
I like it very much, haven't found nothing better since now!!
A suggestion: please add a command line textbox in the GUI
version,
because many options are not accessible through nmapfe.
Thanks a lot, you're the best!! :-)
-- bye
Gabriele
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: The coolest tool for Linux!
by Fyodor - Jan 21st 2004 17:22:35
Thanks, I am glad you find Nmap useful! I agree that an explicit field for
command-line arguments would be valuable. But for now, sticking them in
the "Target(s)" field works fine. Newer versions of NmapFE also support a
larger selection of Nmap arguments, making this less-often necessary. And
of course you can always use the standard command-line version of Nmap for
custom commands.
-Fyodor
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Very good...
by ciever2k - Jan 14th 2002 11:15:06
I like it ! it works very good, stable, secure and a lot of things.
-- www.linux-sources.de
[reply]
[top]
[»]
good scanner
by karellen - May 2nd 2000 03:02:10
This is the best, most flexible and featured open-source port
scanner currently available. Please add a --without-nmapfe
option to the configure script.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: good scanner
by Fyodor - Feb 26th 2003 14:16:23
Thanks! And good idea, --without-nmapfe has been added.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: good scanner
by ykzj - May 4th 2003 07:32:40
> Thanks! And good idea, --without-nmapfe
> has been added.
>
But I can't download it from your website
-- hi
[reply]
[top]
[»]
good software
by Philippe F. - Oct 25th 2005 17:48:37
very useful tool. Thanks for making this free.
-- --
Philippe
[reply]
[top]
|